October Term 2011 · Docket 10-1491

Can corporations face liability under the Alien Tort Statute?

the sides that brought the case seek corporate liability for human rights abuses. the opposing sides argue international law bars such claims.

Official caption
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Hoffman argued that aiding and abetting is a conduct-regulating norm.

    Ms. Sullivan stated that no customary international law source holds corporations liable.

    Mr. Kneedler argued the lower court erred in its categorical ruling.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests whether the Alien Tort Statute allows suits against corporations for human rights violations.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 28, 2012.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to allow corporate liability under the statute.

the opposing sides want the Court to bar corporate liability under the statute.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the lower court erred by categorically barring corporate liability.

the opposing sides argue no international law source holds corporations liable for these offenses.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Alito asked if all judges interpret the relevant opinion the same way.

Justice Kennedy asked if international law recognizes corporate responsibility for these offenses.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute determines whether corporations face legal accountability for human rights abuses abroad.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON