October Term 2010 · Docket 09-152

Does federal law bar state tort claims for vaccine injuries?

the sides that brought the case seek state court damages. the opposing sides seek federal preemption.

Official caption
Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Frederick argued the statute does not protect manufacturers.

    Mr. Horwich argued the CDC role is central to the case.

    Justice Alito questioned the statutory text's redundancy.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests if federal vaccine law blocks state tort claims.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 12, 2010.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want state courts to hear vaccine injury claims.

the opposing sides want federal law to block state tort claims.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the statute does not preempt state law.

the opposing sides argue the statute preempts state tort claims.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Scalia asked about the meaning of unavoidable.

Chief Justice Roberts asked about the compensation scheme purpose.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the scope of federal vaccine liability law.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON