October Term 2008 · Docket 07-1315

Should federal courts retry state court evidence claims?

The dispute centers on whether federal judges must re-examine state court evidence when reviewing habeas petitions.

Official caption
Knowles v. Mirzayance
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Mercer argued the state court decision was reasonable.

    Mr. Sevilla challenged the existence of a specific legal rule.

    Justice Kennedy questioned the weight of the state court's findings.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the limits of federal review over state court decisions.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 13, 2009.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants the federal court to deny relief.

the opposing side wants the federal court to grant relief.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues the state court decision was reasonable.

the opposing side argues the state court decision was unreasonable.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Souter asked if a federal hearing is needed without a state rule.

Justice Kennedy asked how to weigh the state court's factfinding.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the power of federal courts to review state evidence.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON