October Term 2008 · Docket 07-1125

Can Title IX block equal protection claims?

the sides that brought the case seek to sue under the Equal Protection Clause. the opposing sides argue Title IX bars that path.

Official caption
Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Comm.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Charles Rothfeld argued for the sides that brought the case.

    Ms. Hodge argued for the opposing sides.

    Justices questioned the statutory basis of the claims.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests whether Title IX displaces Section 1983 claims. the sides that brought the case want to sue for sex discrimination. the opposing sides want to limit remedies to Title IX.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 2, 2008.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want to sue under the Equal Protection Clause.

the opposing sides want to bar Section 1983 claims.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue Title IX covers broader discrimination than the Constitution.

the opposing sides argue Title IX provides the exclusive remedy.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Roberts asked if Congress omitted a cause of action.

Justice Breyer asked if the complaint alleged specific exclusion.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines the scope of federal anti-discrimination remedies. It determines which legal path students use to challenge bias. The outcome shapes future litigation strategies for schools and families.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON