October Term 2007 · Docket 07-343

Can states impose the death penalty for child rape?

Louisiana seeks to execute a man for raping a child. The defendant argues the Eighth Amendment forbids this punishment.

Official caption
Kennedy v. Louisiana
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Jeffrey Fisher argued that no one has been executed for rape in forty-three years.

    He claimed a long-standing national consensus exists against this punishment.

    He stated that Louisiana's attempt violates the Eighth Amendment.

    Ms. Clark described the brutal nature of the specific crime involved.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The Court must decide if the Eighth Amendment bars the death penalty for rape. Louisiana argues the crime causes unique harm. The defendant claims a national consensus opposes this penalty.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 16, 2008.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Louisiana wants to execute the defendant for raping a child.

The defendant wants the Court to strike down his death sentence.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Louisiana argues that violent child rape causes irreparable harm.

The defendant argues that a national consensus opposes this penalty.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Souter asked if states could define the class as rapists of children under twelve.

Justice Scalia asked how to describe a particularly heinous rape of a child.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the limits of capital punishment for non-homicide crimes. It determines whether states can execute offenders for severe sexual violence. The outcome shapes future sentencing laws for violent crimes.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON