October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1589

Can states require union consent for nonmember fee spending?

the sides that brought the case seek to strike down a state law. the opposing sides defend the statute.

Official caption
Davenport v. Washington Ed. Assn.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    General McKenna argued the statute limits fee use.

    He said it requires nonmember consent for political spending.

    Mr. West argued the statute burdens First Amendment rights.

    He cited three points supporting his position.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests a state statute. The law limits union fee use. It requires nonmember consent for political spending.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 10, 2007.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to strike down the state statute.

the opposing sides want the Court to uphold the state statute.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the statute burdens First Amendment rights.

the opposing sides argue the statute protects election fairness.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Breyer asked about state court interpretation.

Justice Kennedy asked if the Court can disregard state law.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines state power over union funds. It shapes political speech rules. It affects public employee unions nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON