October Term 2006 · Docket 05-1429

Can a bankruptcy court award attorney fees to an unsecured creditor?

The dispute centers on whether federal bankruptcy law permits fee awards to unsecured creditors.

Official caption
Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Travelers claims the lower court rule exists outside the Bankruptcy Code.

    Pacific Gas and Electric asserts state law provides for these fees.

    Justice Kennedy asked about standard promissory notes in bankruptcy.

    Justice Roberts asked if lawyers routinely recover fees in insolvency.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Travelers seeks to overturn a Ninth Circuit rule. Pacific Gas and Electric defends the lower court decision.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 16, 2007.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Travelers wants the Court to reject the Ninth Circuit rule.

Pacific Gas and Electric wants the Court to keep the fee award.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Travelers argues the rule creates unwarranted federal common law.

Pacific Gas and Electric argues state law standards apply to unsecured claims.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Stevens asked if fees are normally recovered in such cases.

Justice Souter asked about the remoteness of the contingency here.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the scope of fee awards in bankruptcy. It affects how unsecured creditors recover costs. It clarifies the structure of the Bankruptcy Code.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON