October Term 2004 · Docket 03-1696

Does a final state court judgment end a federal dispute?

Exxon Mobil and Saudi Basic Industries dispute whether a final state court judgment ends their federal case.

Official caption
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Coleman argued the case is not moot.

    Mr. Castanias argued the case is moot.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Exxon Mobil argues the case remains live. Saudi Basic Industries argues the case is over.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 23, 2005.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Exxon Mobil wants the federal court to keep hearing the case.

Saudi Basic Industries wants the federal court to dismiss the case.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Exxon Mobil claims an ongoing controversy exists between the parties.

Saudi Basic Industries claims the state judgment ends the dispute.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Stevens asked what issues the district court would resolve.

Justice Souter asked what purpose the federal case serves now.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines when federal courts must stop acting. It clarifies the boundary between state and federal power.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON