October Term 2003 · Docket 02-1080

Does the ADEA protect only the oldest workers in a group?

The dispute centers on whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act shields only the oldest employees in a comparison group or all workers over forty.

Official caption
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Donald Verrilli argued the ADEA protects workers over forty from disparate treatment.

    He stated the law rejects the assumption that competence declines with age.

    Paul Clement argued the ADEA prohibits discrimination against the protected class.

    He contended the law is not limited to claims by the oldest members of the class.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

General Dynamics Land Systems argues the law protects only the oldest workers in a group. Dennis Cline argues the law protects all workers over forty from age bias.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 12, 2003.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

General Dynamics wants the Court to limit ADEA protection to the oldest workers in a group.

Cline wants the Court to confirm ADEA protection covers all workers over forty.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

General Dynamics argues the statute requires comparing workers to the oldest members of the group.

Cline argues the statute prohibits bias against any worker over forty based on age.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Justice Scalia asked if the government critique applies equally to the opposing interpretation.

Chief Justice Rehnquist noted the case was submitted after the argument concluded.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines the scope of federal age-discrimination protections for workers over forty. It determines whether employers can dismiss older workers if younger colleagues remain in the group. This rule shapes workplace hiring and retention practices nationwide.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON