October Term 2001 · Docket 01-584

Does the Age Discrimination Act allow disparate impact claims?

the sides that brought the case seek to prove age bias through statistical disparities. the opposing sides argue the statute requires proof of intentional discrimination.

Official caption
Adams v. Florida Power Corp.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Crabtree argued that disparate impact is a valid method of proof in age cases.

    Mr. Nager argued that the Age Discrimination Act does not support disparate impact claims.

    questions_asked_by_justices

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests whether the Age Discrimination in Employment Act permits disparate impact claims. the sides that brought the case argue the statute bans facially neutral actions that harm older workers. the opposing sides contend the law only prohibits intentional age bias.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 20, 2002.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want the Court to allow disparate impact proof in age cases.

the opposing sides want the Court to limit age claims to intentional discrimination.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue the statute bans neutral actions that disproportionately harm older workers.

the opposing sides argue the statute requires proof of specific intent to discriminate.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Rehnquist asked the advocates to clarify their legal arguments.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

The outcome defines how workers prove age bias in employment disputes. It shapes the legal standard for challenging neutral workplace policies.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON