October Term 2001 · Docket 01-488

Does a judge or jury decide facts that raise a sentence?

The dispute centers on who finds facts that increase a criminal sentence.

Official caption
Ring v. Arizona
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the side that brought the case argued the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find facts that raise the sentence.

    the side that brought the case stated the state relies on legislative policy to allow judges to find such facts.

    The Chief Justice asked the side that brought the case to clarify the state's position on legislative policy.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 22, 2002.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the side that brought the case wants a jury to find all facts that raise the sentence.

The state wants a judge to find facts that raise the sentence.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the side that brought the case argues the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find facts that increase the sentence.

The state argues a judge may find facts that increase the sentence.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

The Chief Justice asked the side that brought the case to clarify the state's position on legislative policy.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the power of judges versus juries in sentencing. It determines who finds facts that raise a criminal sentence. The outcome shapes the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON