October Term 2001 · Docket 00-878

Can federal courts review state utility commission actions?

the sides that brought the case seek federal review of state commission orders. the opposing sides oppose this jurisdiction.

Official caption
Mathias v. Worldcom Technologies, Inc.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    the sides that brought the case assert federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction.

    the opposing sides cite Ex parte Young jurisprudence regarding state officials.

    chief_justice_rehnquist_asked_about_name_pronunciation.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

This case tests federal court power over state agencies.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on December 5, 2001.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

the sides that brought the case want federal courts to review state commission orders.

the opposing sides want state courts to handle these disputes.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

the sides that brought the case argue federal law grants jurisdiction over state agencies.

the opposing sides argue state officials must be named as defendants.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Rehnquist asked if he pronounced the advocate's name correctly.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This dispute defines federal oversight of state utility regulators.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON