October Term 2001 · Docket 00-730

Can a federal agency deny a contract to a white-owned firm based on race?

Adarand Constructors seeks to overturn a federal contract denial. The government defends the race-based selection process.

Official caption
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Pendley argued Adarand lost a contract due to race.

    Mr. Olson argued the government showed no inconsistent positions.

    chief_justice_rehnquist_asked_if_the_government_showed_inconsistent_positions.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

Adarand Constructors lost a federal contract in 1989. The company claims a racial program caused the loss. The government defends the selection process. The Court must decide if this practice violates the Constitution.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 31, 2001.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

Adarand wants the contract denial overturned.

The government wants the denial upheld.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

Adarand argues the race-based program violated its rights.

The government argues the selection process was lawful.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Rehnquist asked if the government showed inconsistent positions.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

This case defines the limits of race-based federal contracting. It determines how agencies select contractors. It affects equal access to government business.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON