October Term 2001 · Docket 00-1307

Does the Coal Act bind successor companies to pay retiree health benefits?

The dispute centers on whether a coal company's successor must fund retiree health benefits under federal law.

Official caption
Massanari v. Sigmon Coal Co.
Latest argument session
Latest official Court activity
Latest verified event
Argued
Sources analyzed through
Official Transcript

Verified source milestones

  1. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.
  2. — An official oral-argument transcript was verified.

The arguments, in order

This case may have been argued more than once. Each entry below uses that session's official transcript. Later arguments do not erase earlier ones.

  1. Argument 1 ·

    What happened at the argument

    Mr. Wolfson stated the Coal Act aimed to prevent the collapse of a private health care system.

    Mr. Wolfson argued section 9701(c)(2) targets signatory operators and related successors.

    Mr. Woodrum noted lower courts addressed successor liability before the Eastern Enterprises case.

    Mr. Woodrum claimed the Commissioner argued the Coal Act did not provide for successor liability.

    Read the official transcript for this argument · Official argument details

    Sources used for this argument breakdown

A citizen's guide to the whole case

What this case is about

The case tests the scope of the Coal Act. It asks if successor companies inherit the duty to pay retiree health benefits.

Official sources for this section

How the case got here

The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 7, 2001.

Official sources for this section

What each side wants

The Commissioner seeks to limit the Coal Act's scope to original signatory operators.

Sigmon Coal seeks to hold successor companies liable for retiree health benefits.

Official sources for this section

What each side says

The Commissioner argues the statute does not impose successor liability on new entities.

Sigmon Coal argues the law targets signatories and their related successors.

Official sources for this section

What the justices asked

Chief Justice Rehnquist asked if the case was submitted.

Official sources for this section

Why it matters

Retired coal miners depend on this law for health care. Successor companies face financial obligations under the statute. The outcome defines the scope of federal health benefit mandates.

Official sources for this section

What happens next

This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity.

Official sources for this section

Official Court provenance

Official docket and case history · Official Supreme Court oral-argument detail page

Title and summary sources

Revision history

  1. Revision 1 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.

  2. Revision 2 · Official Transcript ·

    Correction: Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.

Download this sanitized case as JSON