October Term 2009 · Docket 08-1402
Does a 10 percent disparity rule bar habeas relief for jury selection claims?
Smith argues the Michigan Supreme Court misapplied federal precedent. The state insists the lower court acted reasonably.
Showing 1–2 of 2 cases, newest official Court activity first.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-1402
Smith argues the Michigan Supreme Court misapplied federal precedent. The state insists the lower court acted reasonably.
October Term 2009 · Docket 08-810
The dispute centers on whether courts must accept a plan administrator's secondary interpretation of ERISA plan terms.