{"argument_date":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/25-197","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","paragraphs":["Ms. Prelogar argued the suit is a collateral attack, not an appeal, and that district courts lack appellate jurisdiction over state judgments. She requested reversal.","Justice Thomas probed appellate jurisdiction and agency-versus-judgment review. Justice Sotomayor tested what voiding means. Justice Jackson tested reconsidering Rooker-Feldman, and Justice Alito tested overruling it without a request.","A justice's question is not a vote. Oral argument is not a decision."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 1, lines 1-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 1, lines 1-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 33-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 43-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 43-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 53-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 53-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 66, lines 11-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 66, lines 11-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 67, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 67, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 27-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 27-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 51-55","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 51-55"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 73, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 73, lines 17-21"}]}],"caption":"T. M. v. Univ. of MD Medical Sys. Corp.","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-28T20:28:59.630911Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-28T20:28:59.688814Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T23:55:32.963955Z","explanation":"An official Court opinion was verified.","status":"decided"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-30T01:38:33.510506Z","explanation":"An official Court opinion was verified.","status":"decided"}],"case_status":"decided","dek":"The Supreme Court is weighing when federal district courts may revisit a state court judgment under the Rooker-Feldman rule.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 1, lines 1-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 1, lines 1-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 33-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 43-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 43-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 53-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 53-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 66, lines 11-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 66, lines 11-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 67, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 67, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 27-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 27-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 51-55","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 51-55"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 73, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 73, lines 17-21"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2026-04-20T00:00:00Z","maturity":"post_opinion","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/audio/2025/25-197","official_disposition_urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-197_new_4g15.pdf","https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-197diff_8759.pdf"],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/25-197.html","primary_docket":"25-197","revisions":[{"correction_note":null,"created_at":"2026-08-29T00:57:53.557366Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-29T16:47:27.469241Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2},{"correction_note":"Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.","created_at":"2026-08-29T23:48:24.782738Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":3},{"correction_note":"Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.","created_at":"2026-08-30T00:16:28.973650Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":4},{"correction_note":"Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.","created_at":"2026-08-30T01:45:32.935574Z","maturity":"post_opinion","revision_number":5},{"correction_note":"Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.","created_at":"2026-08-30T01:48:36.279667Z","maturity":"post_opinion","revision_number":6},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"post_opinion","revision_number":7}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["Rooker-Feldman generally bars federal district courts from overturning a state court judgment. The question is how far that rule reaches."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 1, lines 1-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 1, lines 1-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 33-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 43-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 43-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 53-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 53-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 66, lines 11-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 66, lines 11-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 67, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 67, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 27-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 27-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 51-55","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 51-55"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 73, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 73, lines 17-21"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["Ms. Prelogar presented the argument for the side that brought the case, and the Chief Justice called for her rebuttal."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 1, lines 1-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 1, lines 1-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 27-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 27-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 73, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 73, lines 17-21"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case asked the Court to reverse the lower court's decision. The record does not describe a separate requested result for the other side.","the side that brought the case conceded the suit is a collateral attack on the state judgment, while maintaining it differs from an appeal. She argued collateral attacks are new cases that can involve new evidence, cannot vacate the state judgment, and face preclusion defenses. She also said district courts can only exercise original jurisdiction, not appellate jurisdiction."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case's answers show the stakes. In a collateral challenge, a district court cannot vacate or revise a state judgment. Remedies stay limited to declarations or injunctions controlling the parties before the court. That shapes what relief litigants can seek.","Justice Thomas asked whether a district court has appellate jurisdiction and how reviewing an agency decision differs from reviewing a court judgment. Justice Sotomayor clarified what the other side meant by review and reject. Justice Jackson asked about reconsidering Rooker-Feldman as a backup. Justice Alito questioned overruling it when the petition did not request that."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["The Chief Justice submitted the case. The Court will issue its decision later."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 33-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 43-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 43-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 66, lines 11-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 66, lines 11-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 67, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 67, lines 45-9"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":[":[]}"],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 1, lines 1-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 1, lines 1-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 33-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 43-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 43-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 53-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 53-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 66, lines 11-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 66, lines 11-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 67, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 67, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 27-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 27-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 51-55","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 51-55"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 73, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 73, lines 17-21"}]},{"heading":"What the Court decided","paragraphs":["The Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which explains that federal district courts cannot act as appeals courts to review state-court judgments. Applies even when the state judgment is still being appealed in state court. T. M.'s federal suit asked the district court to strike down the consent order from her state case, which is exactly the kind of review federal district courts may not do.","The Supreme Court affirmed the Fourth Circuit's judgment, which had upheld the dismissal of T. M.'s federal lawsuit."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Opinion","label":"Official Supreme Court Opinion — file page 2, lines 1-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-197_new_4g15.pdf","page_label":"file page 2, lines 1-1"},{"evidence_type":"Opinion","label":"Official Supreme Court Opinion — file page 4, lines 1-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25-197_new_4g15.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 1-1"}]}],"slug":"2025-25-197-t-m-v-univ-of-md-medical-sys-corp","term":"2025","title":"How far does the rule barring federal courts from overturning state judgments reach?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 1, lines 1-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 1, lines 1-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 33-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 43-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 43-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 53-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 53-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 66, lines 11-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 66, lines 11-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 67, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 67, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 27-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 27-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 35-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 35-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 51-55","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 51-55"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 73, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/25-197_6j37.pdf","page_label":"file page 73, lines 17-21"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":"latest_argument_date","updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}