{"argument_date":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2025","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","paragraphs":["Benjamin Gruenstein argued for the side that brought the case, urging that the law's words set a high bar but do not prescribe which types of reasons qualify.","A government lawyer argued that the law is a narrow exception to sentencing finality, allowing reductions only in limited exceptional circumstances not otherwise addressed by the criminal justice system.","Justices pressed both sides on whether the government's rule would be workable and on the history of Bureau of Prisons practice before 2018."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 20-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 20-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 38-42","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 38-42"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 12-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 12-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 24-28","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 24-28"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 48-56","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 48-56"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 68, lines 22-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 68, lines 22-24"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 48-52","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 48-52"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 56-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 56-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 14-16","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 14-16"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 22-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 22-24"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 32-34","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 32-34"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 54-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 54-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 70, lines 50-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 70, lines 50-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 36-40","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 36-40"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 56-30","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 56-30"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 72, lines 48-16","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 72, lines 48-16"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 74, lines 52-10","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 74, lines 52-10"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 75, lines 12-52","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 75, lines 12-52"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 76, lines 22-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 76, lines 22-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 77, lines 40-44","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 77, lines 40-44"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 77, lines 46-52","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 77, lines 46-52"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 26-30","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 26-30"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 36-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 36-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 52-56","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 52-56"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 12-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 12-46"}]}],"caption":"Fernandez v. United States","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:14.241810Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:14.253868Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T23:55:39.856623Z","explanation":"An official Court opinion was verified.","status":"decided"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-30T01:30:58.342017Z","explanation":"An official Court opinion was verified.","status":"decided"}],"case_status":"decided","dek":"The Supreme Court must decide whether a federal law allowing sentence reductions for extraordinary and compelling reasons covers prisoners who argue their convictions or sentences were legally flawed. Or whether those claims belong elsewhere.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2025-11-12T00:00:00Z","maturity":"post_opinion","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2025","official_disposition_urls":["https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r39_5iek.pdf"],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/24-556.html","primary_docket":"24-556","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-29T21:54:49.895237Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Removed an unsupported statement that the Court had not ruled; the available source set did not establish that absence.","created_at":"2026-08-29T23:48:24.683435Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2},{"correction_note":"Corrected unsupported no-ruling language and clarified that the article's disposition summary is incomplete.","created_at":"2026-08-30T00:16:28.873569Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":3},{"correction_note":"Added the holding and disposition from the verified official Court opinion.","created_at":"2026-08-30T01:30:58.365284Z","maturity":"post_opinion","revision_number":4},{"correction_note":"Removed direct-quotation marks from public paraphrases.","created_at":"2026-08-30T01:49:50.271038Z","maturity":"post_opinion","revision_number":5},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"post_opinion","revision_number":6}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["Fernandez v. United States asks what counts as an extraordinary and compelling reason for reducing a prison sentence. Congress created this standard for sentence reduction motions. The dispute is whether reasons tied to the validity of a conviction or sentence qualify, or whether the standard covers only other kinds of circumstances."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["A lower court rejected the prisoner's request for a sentence reduction. The case reached the Supreme Court after argument on the proper reading of the law."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 12-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 12-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 68, lines 22-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 68, lines 22-24"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case wants courts to allow sentence reductions when reasons include challenges to the conviction or sentence itself. He argues Congress set a high bar but did not limit which types of reasons qualify.","The government wants a narrower rule. It argues the law is a limited exception to final sentences, covering exceptional circumstances not otherwise addressed by the justice system, and excluding attacks on conviction or sentence validity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case says the government's position would be unworkable. Requiring courts in every case to analyze whether a claim could have been brought in a separate habeas proceeding.","The government says its rule excludes attacks on the validity of a conviction or sentence, keeping the reduction standard separate from those challenges."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Alito asked whether the meaning of extraordinary and compelling reasons changed when Congress enacted the First Step Act in 2018.","Justice Thomas asked what kinds of circumstances supported these motions, whether personal circumstances counted. And Whether trial errors ever formed the basis when the Bureau of Prisons initiated the process itself. Justice Sotomayor asked whether published Bureau of Prisons cases went beyond personal circumstances."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 20-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 20-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 38-42","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 38-42"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 24-28","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 24-28"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 48-56","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 48-56"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 68, lines 22-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 68, lines 22-24"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 48-52","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 48-52"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 56-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 56-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 14-16","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 14-16"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 22-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 22-24"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 32-34","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 32-34"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 54-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 54-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 70, lines 50-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 70, lines 50-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 36-40","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 36-40"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 56-30","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 56-30"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 72, lines 48-16","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 72, lines 48-16"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 74, lines 52-10","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 74, lines 52-10"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 75, lines 12-52","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 75, lines 12-52"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 76, lines 22-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 76, lines 22-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 77, lines 40-44","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 77, lines 40-44"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 77, lines 46-52","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 77, lines 46-52"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 26-30","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 26-30"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 36-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 36-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 52-56","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 52-56"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 12-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 12-46"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["The ruling will shape how prisoners can seek sentence reductions and whether claims about flawed convictions can be raised through this law instead of separate habeas proceedings."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"}]},{"heading":"What the Court decided","paragraphs":["A prisoner who argues that his conviction is invalid must challenge it through the postconviction statute, not compassionate release. Doubts about whether a conviction was wrongfully obtained do not count as reasons for early release.","The Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit's judgment, leaving in place its reversal of the District Court's grant of Fernandez's motion."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Opinion","label":"Official Supreme Court Opinion — file page 3, lines 1-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/608us2r39_5iek.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 1-1"}]}],"slug":"2025-24-556-fernandez-v-united-states","term":"2025","title":"Can Courts Reduce Prison Sentences for Claims of Trial Errors Under the Compassionate Release Law?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 24-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 24-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 12-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 12-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 69, lines 26-36","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 69, lines 26-36"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 84, lines 16-54","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2025/24-556_d1o2.pdf","page_label":"file page 84, lines 16-54"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":"latest_argument_date","updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}