{"argument_date":"2019-11-04T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2019-11-04T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2019","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","paragraphs":["Barton's counsel argued the question is what an offense means for the stop-time rule.","Barr's counsel argued the statutory text alone is enough to resolve the case.","Justice Alito questioned whether inadmissibility is a status in ordinary speech.","Justice Sotomayor noted some are found inadmissible not on the basis of a crime."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 33-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 33-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 23-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 23-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 51-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 51-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 55-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 55-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 31-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 31-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 31-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 31-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 31-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 43-53","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 43-53"}]}],"caption":"Barton v. Barr","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:19.629829Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:19.659768Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether a criminal offense renders a lawful permanent resident inadmissible under the stop-time rule.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2019-11-04T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2019","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18-725.html","primary_docket":"18-725","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-30T17:44:16.249136Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests the definition of inadmissibility for the stop-time rule. the side that brought the case Barton argues the term has a specific meaning. the opposing side Barr argues the statutory text controls the outcome."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 4, 2019."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 31-33"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["Barton wants the Court to define inadmissibility narrowly for the stop-time rule.","Barr wants the Court to apply the statutory text broadly to the stop-time rule."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["Barton argues the word inadmissible has a consistent meaning across the statute.","Barr argues the statutory text alone resolves the case regarding Section 1182(a)(2)."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Ginsburg asked when an official fits the status of leaving the country for more than 180 days.","Justice Alito asked why inadmissibility cannot be assessed in a removal proceeding for a resident who has not left the country."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 33-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 33-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 23-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 23-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 51-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 51-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 55-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 55-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 31-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 31-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 31-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 31-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 31-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 43-53","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 43-53"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["The outcome defines how courts calculate time for lawful permanent residents. It clarifies the legal status of criminal offenses in removal proceedings. It sets a standard for applying the stop-time rule to residents."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 33-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 33-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 23-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 23-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 51-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 51-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 55-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 55-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 71, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 71, lines 31-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 31-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 31-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 31-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 31-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 43-53","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 43-53"}]}],"slug":"2019-18-725-barton-v-barr","term":"2019","title":"Does a crime make a resident inadmissible for the stop-time rule?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 35, lines 45-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 35, lines 45-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 23-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 65, lines 43-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2019/18-725_d18f.pdf","page_label":"file page 65, lines 43-29"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}