{"argument_date":"2017-10-10T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2017-10-10T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2017","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","paragraphs":["Hamer's lawyer argued that only Congress can set court jurisdiction.","Neighborhood Housing Services' lawyer argued that the late notice is a strict bar.","justice_question_1"],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 10-12","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 10-12"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 28-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 28-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 42-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 42-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 12-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 12-24"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 22-34","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 22-34"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 48-8","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 48-8"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 46-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 46-50"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 54-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 54-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 36-40","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 36-40"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 14-28","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 14-28"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 48-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 48-50"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 16-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 16-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 42-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 42-50"}]}],"caption":"Hamer v. Neighborhood Housing Serv. of Chicago","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:21.430123Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The parties dispute whether a late appeal notice is a strict legal bar or a flexible deadline.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2017-10-10T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2017","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/16-658.html","primary_docket":"16-658","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-30T18:32:05.215938Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests if a late appeal notice is a strict legal bar or a flexible deadline."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 10, 2017."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 12-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 12-24"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["Hamer wants the court to treat the late notice as a fixable error.","Neighborhood Housing Services wants the court to treat the late notice as a strict bar."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["Hamer argues that only Congress can set court jurisdiction, so this rule is flexible.","Neighborhood Housing Services argues that the rule is a strict legal requirement."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Kennedy asked if parties could delay judgment for years.","Justice Kagan asked if a rule can be jurisdictional without a statute."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 10-12","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 10-12"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 28-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 28-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 42-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 42-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 22-34","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 22-34"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 48-8","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 48-8"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 46-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 46-50"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 54-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 54-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 36-40","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 36-40"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 14-28","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 14-28"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 48-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 48-50"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 16-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 16-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 42-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 42-50"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This dispute defines how strictly courts enforce appeal deadlines for all litigants."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 10-12","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 10-12"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 28-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 28-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 42-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 42-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 12-24","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 12-24"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 22-34","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 22-34"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 48-8","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 48-8"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 46-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 46-50"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 54-18","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 54-18"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 36-40","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 36-40"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 14-28","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 14-28"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 48-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 48-50"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 16-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 16-22"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 42-50","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 42-50"}]}],"slug":"2017-16-658-hamer-v-neighborhood-housing-serv-of-chicago","term":"2017","title":"Can a late appeal notice be fixed by court rules?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 14-48","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 14-48"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 26-20","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-658_mli2.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 26-20"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}