{"argument_date":"2012-11-05T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2012-11-05T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2012","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Estrada argued the Third Circuit wrongly treated damages as a merits issue.","Justice Ginsburg noted liability can be class-wide while damages remain individual.","Justice Breyer questioned why damages cannot be calculated using competitive benchmarks."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 37-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 37-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 41-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 41-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 13-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 13-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 29-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 29-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 41-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 41-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 21-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 14, lines 21-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 47-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 47-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 33-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 33-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 43-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 43-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 47-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 47-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 35-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 35-39"}]}],"caption":"Comcast Corp. v. Behrend","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:35.021056Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"Comcast disputes the lower court's rejection of its expert evidence on class-wide damages.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2012-11-05T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2012","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/11-864.html","primary_docket":"11-864","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T20:22:35.081574Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests whether a class can certify without proving uniform damages."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 5, 2012."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["Comcast wants the class dismissed for lacking uniform damages proof.","Behrend wants the class certified despite individualized damages issues."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["Comcast argues class certification requires proof of uniform damages.","Behrend argues liability can be proven collectively while damages vary."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Breyer asked what specific conduct shows Comcast gained power unfairly.","Justice Kagan asked if the lower courts used a favorable legal standard for Behrend."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 37-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 37-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 41-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 41-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 13-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 13-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 29-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 29-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 41-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 41-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 21-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 14, lines 21-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 47-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 47-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 33-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 33-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 43-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 43-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 47-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 47-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 35-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 35-39"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This dispute defines the evidence needed to certify large consumer classes."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 37-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 37-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 41-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 41-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 13-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 13-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 29-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 29-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 41-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 41-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 21-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 14, lines 21-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 47-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 47-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 33-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 33-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 43-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 43-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 47-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 47-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 35-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 35-39"}]}],"slug":"2012-11-864-comcast-corp-v-behrend","term":"2012","title":"Can a class proceed without proving uniform damages?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 11-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 11-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-864.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-45"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}