{"argument_date":"2013-01-16T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2013-01-16T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2012","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","paragraphs":["Ms. Webre argued that federal jurisdiction requires a substantial federal issue.","She cited the Grable decision to support her position on jurisdiction.","Mr. Michel agreed with the premise of the federal interest argument."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 21-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 21-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 31-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 31-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 5-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 5-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 23-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 23-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 49-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 49-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 7-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 7-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 14, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 15, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 15, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 45-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 45-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 49-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 49-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 23-35"}]}],"caption":"Gunn v. Minton","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:34.810793Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether federal courts must hear patent malpractice claims filed under state law.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2013-01-16T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2012","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/11-1118.html","primary_docket":"11-1118","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-30T22:20:17.123180Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests the scope of federal jurisdiction over state-law claims involving patent issues."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 16, 2013."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case want the case returned to state court.","the opposing sides want the case to remain in federal court."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case argue the federal issue is not substantial enough for federal jurisdiction.","the opposing sides argue patent law is a complex specialty requiring federal oversight."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Ginsburg asked if the federal issue is substantial beyond this specific case.","Justice Alito asked why the complexity of patent law does not favor federal jurisdiction."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 21-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 21-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 31-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 31-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 5-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 5-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 23-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 23-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 49-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 49-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 7-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 7-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 14, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 15, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 15, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 45-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 45-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 49-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 49-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 23-35"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case defines which courts handle patent-related state law claims. It affects access to state courts for legal malpractice disputes. It shapes the balance between state and federal judicial power."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 21-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 21-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 31-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 31-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 12, lines 5-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 12, lines 5-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 23-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 23-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 49-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 49-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 13, lines 7-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 13, lines 7-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 14, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 14, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 15, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 15, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 45-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 45-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 49-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 49-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 23-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 23-35"}]}],"slug":"2012-11-1118-gunn-v-minton","term":"2012","title":"Can a patent malpractice suit stay in state court?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 19-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2012/11-1118-nfh3.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-43"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}