{"argument_date":"2011-11-28T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2011-11-28T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2011","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Panner stated Article III requires a private plaintiff to show injury-in-fact.","He argued factual injury does not automatically follow from a statutory violation.","Mr. Panner claimed a violation of a duty is not itself an injury.","Justice Sotomayor questioned if the argument applies to statutory damages broadly."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 41-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 41-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 5-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 5-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 43-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 43-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 7-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 7-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 49-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 49-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 51-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 51-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 19-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 19-31"}]}],"caption":"First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:24.674182Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:24.719159Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"the sides that brought the case argue a legal breach does not equal harm. the opposing sides claim the law presumes injury exists.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2011-11-28T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2011","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/10-708.html","primary_docket":"10-708","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-30T23:37:36.906674Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case tests whether a plaintiff must prove actual harm. the sides that brought the case say a legal breach is not injury. the opposing sides say the statute presumes injury exists."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 28, 2011."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 45-49"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case want the Court to require proof of actual harm.","the opposing sides want the Court to accept a presumption of injury."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case argue Article III requires showing the conduct made the plaintiff worse off.","the opposing sides argue Congress intended to protect against potential harm from kickbacks."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Sotomayor asked if the position applies to statutory damages.","Justice Ginsburg asked why Congress acted on potential harm from kickbacks."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 41-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 41-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 5-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 5-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 43-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 43-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 7-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 7-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 49-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 49-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 51-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 51-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 19-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 19-31"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This dispute defines the minimum proof needed for private lawsuits. It shapes how courts handle statutory violations. It affects the burden of proof for plaintiffs nationwide."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 41-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 41-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 5-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 5-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 43-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 43-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 7-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 7-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 49-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 49-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 39-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 39-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 51-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 51-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 19-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 19-31"}]}],"slug":"2011-10-708-first-american-financial-corp-v-edwards","term":"2011","title":"Does a statutory violation alone prove injury for damages?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 48, lines 41-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 48, lines 41-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-708.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-3"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}