{"argument_date":"2011-10-04T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2011-10-04T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2011","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case's counsel argued Arizona requires ineffective assistance claims in postconviction proceedings.","the opposing side's counsel argued the state rule is a valid procedural default.","Justice Ginsburg questioned the rationale for the state rule.","Justice Alito asked about the right to counsel for late-arising claims."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 25-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 25-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 15-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 15-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 25-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 25-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 3-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 3-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 37-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 37-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 39-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 39-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 9-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 9-15"}]}],"caption":"Martinez v. Ryan","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:35.683552Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"Arizona requires defendants to raise ineffective assistance claims in state postconviction proceedings. the side that brought the case argues this rule blocks federal habeas review.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2011-10-04T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2011","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/10-1001.html","primary_docket":"10-1001","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-30T23:50:27.629037Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case tests whether a state procedural rule bars federal courts from reviewing ineffective assistance claims. the side that brought the case seeks federal review. the opposing side seeks to uphold the state rule."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 4, 2011."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case wants federal courts to review the ineffective assistance claim despite the state procedural default.","the opposing side wants the state procedural rule to bar federal review of the claim."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case argues the state rule creates an independent barrier to federal review of constitutional claims.","the opposing side argues the state rule is a valid procedural default that bars federal review."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Ginsburg asked why the state rule should bar federal review.","Justice Alito asked if a right to counsel exists when a claim could not be raised earlier."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 25-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 25-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 15-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 15-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 25-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 25-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 3-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 3-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 37-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 37-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 39-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 39-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 9-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 9-15"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["The outcome determines whether federal courts can review ineffective assistance claims barred by state procedural rules. This affects the scope of federal habeas review for criminal defendants."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 25-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 25-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 15-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 15-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 29-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 29-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 11-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 25-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 25-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 3-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 3-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 37-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 37-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 39-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 39-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 9-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 9-15"}]}],"slug":"2011-10-1001-martinez-v-ryan","term":"2011","title":"Does Arizona's rule bar federal review of ineffective assistance claims?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 15-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 15-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 3-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 3-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 51, lines 11-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2011/10-1001.pdf","page_label":"file page 51, lines 11-21"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}