{"argument_date":"2011-03-28T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2011-03-28T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","paragraphs":["CSX argued prior decisions established a proximate cause requirement.","McBride argued the statute text supports a negligence-only standard.","questions_asked_by_justices"],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 13-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 13-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 27-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 27-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 39-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 39-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 43-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 43-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 13-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 13-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 15-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 15-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 43-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 43-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 29-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 29-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 9-13"}]}],"caption":"CSX Transp., Inc. v. McBride","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:35.776031Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"CSX argues FELA requires a proximate cause instruction. McBride argues the statute only requires negligence.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2011-03-28T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/10-235.html","primary_docket":"10-235","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T00:04:53.921436Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case concerns the jury instruction standard for railroad negligence claims under FELA."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 28, 2011."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["CSX wants the Court to mandate a proximate cause instruction.","McBride wants the Court to uphold the negligence-only instruction."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["CSX argues FELA contains an implicit proximate cause requirement.","McBride argues the statute text only requires negligence causation."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Ginsburg asked how to explain the difference between negligence and proximate cause to a jury.","Justice Sotomayor asked if juries understand the concept of proximate cause."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 13-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 13-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 27-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 27-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 39-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 39-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 43-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 43-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 13-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 13-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 15-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 15-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 43-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 43-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 29-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 29-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 9-13"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["The outcome defines the legal standard for proving railroad negligence. It determines the burden of proof for injured workers. It shapes jury instructions in federal courts."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 13-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 13-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 27-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 27-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 39-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 39-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 43-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 43-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 47-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 47-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 13-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 13-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 37-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 37-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 15-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 15-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 43-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 43-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 29-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 29-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 9-13"}]}],"slug":"2010-10-235-csx-transp-inc-v-mcbride","term":"2010","title":"Does FELA require a proximate cause instruction?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 45-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 45-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/10-235.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-41"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}