{"argument_date":"2011-03-30T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2011-03-30T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Lefkowitz argued federal law requires identical generic labels.","Mr. Bograd argued the makers ignored inadequate warnings.","Mr. Kneedler argued Hatch-Waxman does not absolve safety duties."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 39-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 39-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 11-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 11-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 49-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 49-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 35-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 35-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 9-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 9-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 41-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 41-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 43-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 43-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 19-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 19-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 41-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 41-11"}]}],"caption":"Pliva, Inc. v. Mensing","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:25.019652Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"Plaintiffs claim generic makers ignored safety risks. Defendants argue federal law blocks such claims.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2011-03-30T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/09-993.html","primary_docket":"09-993","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T00:01:32.120412Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests whether state tort law can override federal drug labeling rules."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 30, 2011."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 7-17"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["Plaintiffs want damages for alleged failure to warn.","Defendants want dismissal of the state-law claims."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["Plaintiffs argue the makers ignored known safety risks.","Defendants argue federal law mandates identical labels to brand drugs."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Sotomayor asked if the makers disavow FDA reporting duties.","Justice Kennedy asked if this involves the take-steps doctrine."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 39-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 39-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 11-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 11-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 49-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 49-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 35-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 35-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 9-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 9-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 41-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 41-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 43-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 43-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 19-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 19-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 41-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 41-11"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This dispute defines the boundary between state safety laws and federal drug regulation."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 39-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 39-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 11-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 11-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 49-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 49-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 35-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 35-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 39-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 39-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 9-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 9-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 41-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 41-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 43-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 43-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 5-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 19-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 19-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 41-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 41-11"}]}],"slug":"2010-09-993-pliva-inc-v-mensing","term":"2010","title":"Can state law force generic drug makers to change FDA-approved labels?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 49-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 49-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 44, lines 11-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-993.pdf","page_label":"file page 44, lines 11-25"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}