{"argument_date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","paragraphs":["Ms. Palmer argued formality determines the statement's legal status.","Mr. Van Hoek argued past crime reports can imply ongoing emergencies.","Justice Scalia rejected formality as the deciding factor.","Justice Sotomayor emphasized the declarant's primary purpose matters."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 35-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 35-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 9-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 9-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 41-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 41-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 5-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 5-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 31-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 29-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 29-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 47-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 47-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 7-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 7-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 5-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 5-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 13-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 13-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 3-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 3-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 63, lines 19-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 63, lines 19-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 43-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 43-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 7-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 7-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 31-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 31-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 39-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 39-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 11-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 11-11"}]}],"caption":"Michigan v. Bryant","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:35.898398Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:35.911902Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The case tests whether a dying man's answers to police questions count as formal testimony or an urgent emergency report.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/09-150.html","primary_docket":"09-150","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T01:03:55.065030Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The dispute centers on the legal status of a dying victim's statements. Michigan argues the statements served an emergency purpose. The defense argues they served a testimonial purpose."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on October 5, 2010."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["Michigan wants the Court to admit the victim's statements as evidence.","The defense wants the Court to keep the victim's statements excluded."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["Michigan argues the statements served an urgent emergency purpose.","The defense argues the statements served a formal testimonial purpose."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Ginsburg asked how to distinguish emergency questions from testimonial ones.","Justice Sotomayor asked who holds the primary purpose of the inquiry."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 35-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 35-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 9-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 9-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 41-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 41-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 5-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 5-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 31-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 29-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 29-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 47-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 47-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 7-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 7-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 5-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 5-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 13-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 13-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 3-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 3-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 63, lines 19-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 63, lines 19-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 43-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 43-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 7-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 7-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 31-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 31-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 39-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 39-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 11-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 11-11"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["The ruling defines when police questioning creates testimonial evidence. It shapes how courts treat dying victims' statements. It affects the balance between public safety and defendant rights."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 35-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 35-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 9-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 9-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 41-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 41-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 5-27","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 5-27"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 31-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 31-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 29-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 29-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 47-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 47-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 7-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 7-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 5-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 5-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 13-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 13-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 62, lines 3-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 62, lines 3-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 63, lines 19-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 63, lines 19-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 43-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 43-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 7-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 7-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 31-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 31-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 39-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 39-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 11-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 11-11"}]}],"slug":"2010-09-150-michigan-v-bryant","term":"2010","title":"Does a dying victim's statement to police count as testimony or an emergency report?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 20, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 20, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 31, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 31, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 45-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 45-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 37-1","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-150.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 37-1"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}