{"argument_date":"2011-03-01T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2011-03-01T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Kroger argued the Court should dismiss the case due to lack of standing.","Ms. Kubitschek argued no case or controversy exists between the parties.","Justice Ginsburg questioned why the official would face liability without a challenge.","Justice Kennedy asked about the official's current occupation and record details."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 3-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 3-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 3-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 3-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 19-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 19-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 27-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 27-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 45-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 45-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 7-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 7-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 35-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 35-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 43-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 43-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 45-49"}]}],"caption":"Camreta v. Greene","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:25.114362Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether a case remains justiciable when a plaintiff stops challenging a lower court ruling.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2011-03-01T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2010","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/09-1454.html","primary_docket":"09-1454","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T00:11:45.719840Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The Court examines if a live controversy exists when a plaintiff abandons a specific legal claim."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 1, 2011."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 7-17"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case want the Court to dismiss the case for lack of standing.","the opposing sides want the Court to review the qualified immunity decision."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case argue no case or controversy exists because the plaintiff dropped the claim.","the opposing sides argue the lower court ruling remains reviewable despite the dropped claim."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Kagan asked how a judgment would affect the legal relationship between the parties.","Justice Scalia questioned reviewability when Article III requirements are not met."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 3-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 3-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 3-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 3-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 19-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 19-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 27-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 27-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 45-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 45-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 7-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 7-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 35-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 35-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 43-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 43-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 45-49"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case defines the scope of federal court jurisdiction over abandoned claims. It clarifies when a dispute becomes moot. It impacts the development of constitutional precedent."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 10, lines 3-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 10, lines 3-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 11, lines 3-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 11, lines 3-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 19-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 19-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 27-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 27-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 45-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 45-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 7-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 7-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 35-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 35-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 43-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 43-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 9, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 9, lines 45-49"}]}],"slug":"2010-09-1454-camreta-v-greene","term":"2010","title":"Does a plaintiff retain standing after dropping a constitutional claim?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 29-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 29-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 27, lines 25-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 27, lines 25-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 19-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2010/09-1454.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 19-45"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}