{"argument_date":"2010-01-12T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2010-01-12T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2009","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","paragraphs":["Ms. Howe argued the Convention requires returning abducted children to their habitual residence.","Ms. Howe stated the Convention aims to prevent abduction and ensure proper court resolution.","Ms. Anders argued the ne exeat provision prevents the specific harm the Convention addresses.","Mr. Hays argued custody and access rights are distinct substantive legal concepts."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 15-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 15-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 11-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 11-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 3-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 3-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 11-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 11-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 47-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 47-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 5-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 5-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 19-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 19-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 23-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 23-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 47-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 47-3"}]}],"caption":"Timothy Mark Cameron Abbott v. Jacquelyn Vaye Abbott","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:25.817765Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether a ne exeat order grants custody rights under the Hague Convention.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2010-01-12T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2009","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/08-645.html","primary_docket":"08-645","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T01:41:34.271219Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case involves a child custody dispute under the Hague Convention. The parties disagree on the legal effect of a ne exeat order. One side argues the order grants custody rights. The other side argues it only grants access rights. The Court must interpret the Convention's definitions."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on January 12, 2010."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case wants the Court to recognize the ne exeat order as a custody right.","the opposing side wants the Court to classify the order as an access right only."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case argues the order prevents abduction and aligns with the Convention's goals.","the opposing side argues the Convention distinguishes custody from access and limits return remedies."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Sotomayor asked if the woman must go to the Chilean court.","Justice Ginsburg asked if the argument relies on the statute rather than the order."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 15-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 15-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 11-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 11-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 3-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 3-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 11-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 11-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 47-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 47-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 5-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 5-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 19-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 19-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 23-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 23-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 47-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 47-3"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case defines the scope of custody rights under the Hague Convention. It determines how courts handle international child removals. The outcome shapes future custody disputes involving foreign orders. It impacts the balance between parental rights and child welfare."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 15-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 15-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 17-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 17-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 11-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 11-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 3-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 3-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 11-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 11-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 47-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 47-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 5-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 5-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 11-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 11-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 19-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 19-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 23-31","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 23-31"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 47-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 47-3"}]}],"slug":"2009-08-645-timothy-mark-cameron-abbott-v-jacquelyn-vaye-abbott","term":"2009","title":"Does a ne exeat order grant custody rights under the Hague Convention?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 19, lines 15-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 19, lines 15-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 29, lines 37-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 29, lines 37-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-645.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-13"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}
