{"argument_date":"2010-03-23T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2010-03-23T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2009","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Richie argued the NLRB Act clearly states a quorum of three is required at all times.","Mr. Katyal argued section 153(b) permits delegation of any or all board powers to three or more members.","Justice Scalia questioned whether the side that brought the case's argument relies on the board's inability to act when membership falls below three.","Justice Scalia asked if the board can pay salaries when its quorum disappears."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 35-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 35-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 25-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 25-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 45-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 45-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 9-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 15-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 15-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 33-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 33-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 45-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 45-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 53, lines 7-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 53, lines 7-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 7-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 7-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 23-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 23-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 23-29"}]}],"caption":"New Process Steel, L. P. v. NLRB","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:25.561011Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:25.590201Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether the NLRB can issue adjudicatory decisions when its membership falls below the statutory quorum of three.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2010-03-23T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2009","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/08-1457.html","primary_docket":"08-1457","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T01:20:48.417410Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The NLRB Act requires a quorum of three members. the side that brought the case argues this rule is absolute. the opposing side argues the board can delegate full powers to a three-member group."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on March 23, 2010."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 53, lines 7-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 53, lines 7-49"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case wants the Court to hold that the NLRB cannot issue decisions with only two members.","the opposing side wants the Court to allow the NLRB to issue decisions when its membership falls to two."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case argues the NLRB Act clearly states a quorum of three is required at all times.","the opposing side argues section 153(b) permits delegation of any or all board powers to three or more members."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Scalia asked if the side that brought the case's argument relies on the board's inability to act when membership falls below three.","Justice Scalia asked if the board can pay salaries when its quorum disappears."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 35-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 35-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 25-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 25-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 45-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 45-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 9-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 15-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 15-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 33-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 33-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 45-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 45-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 53, lines 7-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 53, lines 7-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 7-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 7-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 23-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 23-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 23-29"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case determines whether the NLRB can continue issuing adjudicatory decisions when its membership falls below the statutory quorum of three."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 35-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 35-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 25-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 25-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 45-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 45-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 51-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 51-3"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 9-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 15-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 15-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 33-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 33-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 45-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 45-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 53, lines 7-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 53, lines 7-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 29-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 29-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 7-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 7-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 23-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 23-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 23-29"}]}],"slug":"2009-08-1457-new-process-steel-l-p-v-nlrb","term":"2009","title":"Can the NLRB issue decisions with only two members?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 39-21","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 39-21"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1457.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-33"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}