{"argument_date":"2009-11-04T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2009-11-04T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2009","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","paragraphs":["Stephen Sanders argued that absolute immunity prevents suits against prosecutors for actions during judicial proceedings.","Nathan Katyal argued that a cause of action exists against prosecutors for fabricating evidence.","Paul Clement argued that the Court has already rejected liability for prosecutors in similar contexts."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 41-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 41-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 49-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 49-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 29-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 29-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 13-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 13-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 31-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 31-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 58, lines 45-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 58, lines 45-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 11-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 11-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 43-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 43-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 5-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 19-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 19-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 41-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 41-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 9-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 15-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 15-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 31-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 31-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 41-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 41-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 7-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 7-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 5-11"}]}],"caption":"Pottawattamie County v. McGhee","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:26.083308Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:26.107810Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether prosecutors hold absolute immunity from civil liability for allegedly fabricating evidence.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2009-11-04T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2009","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/08-1065.html","primary_docket":"08-1065","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T01:56:49.271272Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["Pottawattamie County and the state argue that prosecutors enjoy absolute immunity from civil suits for actions taken during judicial proceedings. McGhee contends that this immunity does not shield prosecutors from liability for fabricating evidence. The Court must determine if a cause of action exists against prosecutors for such conduct."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 4, 2009."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 58, lines 45-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 58, lines 45-7"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["Pottawattamie County wants the Court to affirm the dismissal of the civil suit against the prosecutor.","McGhee wants the Court to reverse the dismissal and allow the civil suit against the prosecutor to proceed."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["Pottawattamie County argues that absolute immunity protects prosecutors from civil liability for actions taken during judicial proceedings, including evidence fabrication.","McGhee argues that absolute immunity does not protect prosecutors from civil liability for fabricating evidence, distinguishing this conduct from standard judicial functions."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Justice Kennedy asked if the legal analysis should be identical when a police officer or a prosecutor fabricates evidence.","Justice Scalia asked if the prosecutor would be treated just like a police officer in this context."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 41-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 41-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 49-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 49-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 29-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 29-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 13-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 13-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 31-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 31-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 58, lines 45-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 58, lines 45-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 11-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 11-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 43-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 43-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 5-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 19-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 19-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 41-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 41-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 9-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 15-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 15-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 31-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 31-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 41-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 41-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 7-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 7-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 5-11"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case defines the scope of civil liability for prosecutors. It determines whether citizens can sue prosecutors for fabricating evidence. The outcome shapes the balance between prosecutorial independence and individual accountability."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 41-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 41-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 49-51","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 49-51"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 7-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 7-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 29-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 29-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 5, lines 13-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 5, lines 13-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 31-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 31-37"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 58, lines 45-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 58, lines 45-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 11-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 11-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 59, lines 43-49","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 59, lines 43-49"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 6, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 6, lines 5-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 19-25","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 19-25"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 41-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 41-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 60, lines 9-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 60, lines 9-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 61, lines 15-17","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 61, lines 15-17"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 17-19","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 17-19"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 31-35","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 31-35"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 41-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 41-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 45-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 45-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 7, lines 7-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 7, lines 7-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 8, lines 5-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 8, lines 5-11"}]}],"slug":"2009-08-1065-pottawattamie-county-v-mcghee","term":"2009","title":"Can a prosecutor face a civil suit for fabricating evidence?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 16, lines 51-23","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 16, lines 51-23"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 47-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 47-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 19-39","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 19-39"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 57, lines 23-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2009/08-1065.pdf","page_label":"file page 57, lines 23-29"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}