{"argument_date":"2004-02-24T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2004-02-24T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2003","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","paragraphs":["Ms. Gorman argued Congress created a bright line rule.","Mr. Phillips argued the term is not a term of art.","Mr. Garre argued the claims face a uniform limit.","Mr. Newsom argued states need a clear rule."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 6-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 6-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 20-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 20-22"}]}],"caption":"Jones v. R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co.","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:30.426472Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:30.452909Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The parties dispute whether a federal statute sets the deadline for state law employment claims.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2004-02-24T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2003","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/02-1205.html","primary_docket":"02-1205","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T15:55:45.315486Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case tests the scope of a federal statute of limitations."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on February 24, 2004."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 6-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 6-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 20-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 20-22"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case want a four-year deadline for their claims.","the opposing sides want a shorter deadline for their claims."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case argue the federal statute creates a clear rule.","the opposing sides argue the phrase lacks a single uniform meaning."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["The Chief Justice asked if the case was submitted."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 20-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 20-22"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["The outcome defines the deadline for federal civil actions."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 6-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 6-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 20-22","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 20-22"}]}],"slug":"2003-02-1205-jones-v-r-r-donnelley-sons-co","term":"2003","title":"Does a four-year federal limit apply to state employment discrimination claims?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 17, lines 2-26","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 17, lines 2-26"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 26, lines 34-14","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 26, lines 34-14"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 4, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 4, lines 16-32"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 45, lines 24-46","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 45, lines 24-46"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 42-47","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 42-47"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 52, lines 16-32","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2003/02-1205.pdf","page_label":"file page 52, lines 16-32"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}