{"argument_date":"2001-11-05T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2001-11-05T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2001","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Wagner argued the opposing side relies on Holloway.","Mr. Wagner stated Holloway presumes prejudice in specific scenarios.","Mr. Gornstein argued the Sixth Amendment requires showing actual conflict.","Mr. Gornstein stated adverse effect on performance is necessary for a violation."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 56, lines 43-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 56, lines 43-45"}]}],"caption":"Mickens v. Taylor","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:32.861784Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:32.893569Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"the sides that brought the case argue a conflict requires proof of harm. the opposing sides argue the Sixth Amendment is violated by the conflict itself.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2001-11-05T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2001","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/00-9285.html","primary_docket":"00-9285","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T17:32:38.028635Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests the standard for ineffective assistance claims. It asks if a lawyer conflict requires proof of harm."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 5, 2001."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 56, lines 43-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 56, lines 43-45"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case want the Court to require proof of harm.","the opposing sides want the Court to presume harm from the conflict."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the sides that brought the case argue the Sixth Amendment requires showing actual conflict and adverse effect.","the opposing sides argue Holloway presumes prejudice when a court compels conflicted representation."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Chief Justice Rehnquist asked if the case is submitted."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 56, lines 43-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 56, lines 43-45"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This standard defines when a lawyer conflict violates constitutional rights. It determines the burden of proof for criminal defendants."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 56, lines 43-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 56, lines 43-45"}]}],"slug":"2001-00-9285-mickens-v-taylor","term":"2001","title":"Does a lawyer conflict require proof of harm?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 28, lines 49-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 28, lines 49-29"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 47, lines 29-9","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 47, lines 29-9"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 7-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 7-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 55, lines 37-41","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-9285.pdf","page_label":"file page 55, lines 37-41"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}
