{"argument_date":"2001-11-27T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2001-11-27T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2001","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","paragraphs":["The government contends that the lower court decision conflicts with established precedent.","the opposing side maintains that the lower court applied the correct legal standard.","questions_asked_by_justices"],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 33-37"}]}],"caption":"United States v. Arvizu","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:32.674717Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"},{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:32.697947Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether officers must disregard specific facts during a stop.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2001-11-27T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2001","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/00-1519.html","primary_docket":"00-1519","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T17:28:00.230716Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case tests the standard for reasonable suspicion during investigative stops."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 27, 2001."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 33-37"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["The government wants the Court to allow officers to consider all relevant facts.","the opposing side wants the Court to require officers to disregard certain facts."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["The government argues that reasonable suspicion requires a common-sense evaluation of all circumstances.","the opposing side argues that the lower court correctly required ignoring specific details."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["Chief Justice Rehnquist asked who should receive due weight in evaluating officer conduct."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 33-37"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case defines the scope of police discretion during brief investigative stops."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 33-37","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 33-37"}]}],"slug":"2001-00-1519-united-states-v-arvizu","term":"2001","title":"Does a traffic stop require ignoring relevant facts?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 24, lines 39-5","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 24, lines 39-5"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-7","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-7"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 49, lines 43-13","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1519.pdf","page_label":"file page 49, lines 43-13"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}