{"argument_date":"2001-11-26T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2001-11-26T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2001","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","paragraphs":["Mr. Bolter argued Section 1367 solves procedural problems.","Mr. Rotenberg emphasized the federalism issue in the case.","Mr. Clement argued the statute excludes nonconsenting states.","The Chief Justice noted the case was submitted."],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 27-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 27-29"}]}],"caption":"Raygor v. Regents of Univ. of Minn.","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:32.624342Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"The dispute centers on whether federal courts retain jurisdiction over state claims after dismissing federal claims.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2001-11-26T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2001","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/00-1514.html","primary_docket":"00-1514","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T17:28:30.959892Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["This case tests the scope of supplemental jurisdiction under federal law."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on November 26, 2001."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case wants the federal court to keep the state claims.","the opposing side wants the federal court to drop the state claims."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["the side that brought the case argues Congress intended to solve procedural problems in federal courts.","the opposing side argues federal law should not apply to nonconsenting states."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["The Chief Justice asked if the case was submitted."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 27-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 27-29"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This issue defines the boundary between federal and state judicial power. It determines which courts handle mixed legal disputes. It affects the balance of power between governments."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 27-29","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 27-29"}]}],"slug":"2001-00-1514-raygor-v-regents-of-univ-of-minn","term":"2001","title":"Can a state sue in federal court after a related case dismisses?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 39-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 39-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-11","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-11"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 41, lines 5-33","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2001/00-1514.pdf","page_label":"file page 41, lines 5-33"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}