{"argument_date":"2001-04-17T00:00:00Z","arguments":[{"argument_date":"2001-04-17T00:00:00Z","heading":"What happened at the argument","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2000","official_transcript_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","paragraphs":["The government argued the fees do not abridge speech.","The producers argued the fees compel unwanted speech.","questions_asked_by_justices"],"reargument":false,"sequence":1,"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 1-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 1-3"}]}],"caption":"United States v. United Foods, Inc.","case_history":[{"changed_at":"2026-08-29T20:06:33.115103Z","explanation":"An official oral-argument transcript was verified.","status":"argued"}],"case_status":"argued","dek":"Mushroom producers challenge mandatory fees for government marketing programs.","dek_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"}],"dispositions":[],"latest_court_document_date":"2001-04-17T00:00:00Z","maturity":"official_transcript","official_detail_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcript/2000","official_disposition_urls":[],"official_docket_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/public/00-276.html","primary_docket":"00-276","revisions":[{"correction_note":"Rewritten to the concise citizen-facing editorial standard.","created_at":"2026-08-31T17:54:02.747239Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":1},{"correction_note":"Migrated to the dated official Court activity contract without model use.","created_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z","maturity":"official_transcript","revision_number":2}],"schema_version":"1.1","sections":[{"heading":"What this case is about","paragraphs":["The case tests whether forced funding of speech violates the First Amendment."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"}]},{"heading":"How the case got here","paragraphs":["The Supreme Court heard oral argument in this case on April 17, 2001."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"}]},{"heading":"What each side wants","paragraphs":["The government seeks to keep the mandatory fees in place.","The producers seek to strike down the mandatory fees."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"}]},{"heading":"What each side says","paragraphs":["The government argues the fees do not abridge speech rights.","The producers argue the fees compel unwanted speech."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"}]},{"heading":"What the justices asked","paragraphs":["The Chief Justice asked if the case was submitted."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 1-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 1-3"}]},{"heading":"Why it matters","paragraphs":["This case defines the limits of compelled funding for commercial speech."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"}]},{"heading":"What happens next","paragraphs":["This article currently covers the argument record. Use the official docket link for later case activity."],"sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 5-15","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 5-15"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 50, lines 1-3","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 50, lines 1-3"}]}],"slug":"2000-00-276-united-states-v-united-foods-inc","term":"2000","title":"Do mandatory industry assessments violate free speech?","title_sources":[{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 25, lines 35-45","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 25, lines 35-45"},{"evidence_type":"Transcript","label":"Official Supreme Court Transcript — file page 3, lines 17-43","official_url":"https://www.supremecourt.gov/pdfs/transcripts/2000/00-276.pdf","page_label":"file page 3, lines 17-43"}],"topics":[],"undated_disposition_date_fallback":null,"updated_at":"2026-09-05T03:22:24Z"}