2020 Supreme Court term

JANET L. YELLEN SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION, ET AL.

Dockets 20-543Decided
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

The Supreme Court held that Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) are “Indian tribes” under the Indian Self‑Determination Act (ISDA), making them eligible for relief under the CARES Act.

Background and question before the Court

According to Justice Sotomayor, the Court was asked to decide whether ANCs are “Indian tribes” under ISDA and therefore eligible for CARES Act relief.

The Treasury Department had previously determined that ANCs were eligible for CARES Act relief and set aside more than $500 million for them.

What each side argues

Federally Recognized Tribes (Respondents)

According to federally recognized tribes, they argue that only federally recognized tribes qualify as “Indian tribes” under ISDA, and therefore ANCs are excluded.

One respondent tribe contends that the CARES Act excludes ANCs because they lack a “recognized governing body.”

Secretary of the Treasury (Petitioner)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

Other Respondents (Guarnieri, Clement, Rasmussen, etc.)

According to Mr. Guarnieri, mr. Guarnieri warns that affirming the D.C. Circuit’s decision could have wide‑reaching effects on other federal programs.

According to Mr. Rasmussen, mr. Rasmussen notes that Congress faced substantial uncertainty in 1975 about how ANCs would fit into ISDA, supporting the view that the statute’s language was ambiguous.

What happened at oral argument

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What the Court decided

The Court held that ANCs are “Indian tribes” under ISDA, making them eligible for CARES Act relief.

The Court declined to take the “doubtful step” of reading the statute to exclude ANCs.

Why it matters

The decision clarifies the statutory definition of “Indian tribe” for future federal programs that rely on ISDA definitions.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • b36a6cd506f35daba259-r1-8d043f3930f4bf2d.pdfopinion
  • ce9ea5e577f2c7ba7041-r1-d293fbb46078af16.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 28, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.