2020 Supreme Court term

BORDEN v. UNITED STATES

Dockets 19-5410Decided
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

According to Justice Thomas, the Court examined whether the ACCA’s elements clause covers a reckless aggravated assault conviction.

What each side argues

Petitioner (Charles Borden, Jr.)

According to Petitioner, the word means “in opposition to,” introducing the target of the preceding action.

United States (Government)

According to United States, the United States defined “against” as meaning “making contact with,” describing the mere recipient of force.

According to United States, the Government pointed to the Court’s decision in Voisine as its main response to the petitioner’s arguments.

What happened at oral argument

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What the Court decided

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 962ede2180a7b13ce03e-r1-e5b53a3d09a8a7fb.pdfopinion
  • e442c8fed86edc9deda7-r1-668d227dd064d252.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 28, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.