2019 Supreme Court term

LAURA PETER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE v. NANTKWEST, INC.

Dockets 18-801Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What each side argues

Petitioner (Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office)

According to Petitioner (Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office), according to Petitioner (Laura Peter, Deputy Director, Patent and Trademark Office), section 145 requires an unsuccessful patent applicant who files suit under that provision to pay all the expenses of the proceeding.

Government

According to Government, there is no other statute that would be affected by the Court’s decision.

What happened at oral argument

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

expensae litis
"expensae litis" literally means expenses of litigation, as defined by the Heritage Reporting Corporation's Bouvier Legal Dictionary.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 585a0b69e33129d061bb-r1-6503ebbc1877ebed.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 27, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.