2019 Supreme Court term

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY ET AL. v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD. ET AL.

Dockets 18-565Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

The petitioner faces an exposure of more than $140 million in potential damages.

Background and question before the Court

According to Ms. Ross, petitioner argues the safe‑berth clause is a warranty that obligates the charterer to choose a port that is actually safe, not merely a port the charterer believes to be safe after exercising due diligence.

According to Private Respondents, respondent contends that the clause’s language leaves its meaning in equipoise, allowing for different interpretations depending on context.

What each side argues

Petitioner (CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY) Position

According to Ms. Ross, the petitioner argues that the safe‑berth clause is a warranty that obligates the charterer to choose a port that is actually safe, not merely a port the charterer believes to be safe after exercising due diligence.

Respondent (FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD.) Position

According to Private Respondents, the respondent contends that the clause’s language leaves its meaning in equipoise, allowing for different interpretations depending on context.

What happened at oral argument

According to Justice Ginsburg, justice Ginsburg noted that the rule from the Seventh and Second Circuits has been applied for some time.

According to Justice Kagan, justice Kagan referenced the Fifth Circuit’s approach while discussing the contract language.

According to Justice Alito, justice Alito questioned how to resolve a text that can be read in two ways.

Justice Sotomayor asked why the charterer should bear the expense, risk, and peril of lighterage.

According to Justice Kavanaugh, justice Kavanaugh highlighted the contract language requiring the charterer to designate and procure a safe place or wharf.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • be94d172e5299003fa71-r1-2740cc3996bd637f.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 27, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.