This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.
In brief
Overview
Background and question before the Court
What each side argues
Petitioner
Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.
Amici Curiae (Texas et al.)
Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.
What happened at oral argument
Kyle D. Hawkins, speaking for Texas et al., as amici curiae, supports affirmance.
Petitioner argues that there are practical problems and other concerns with the petitioner's view.
What the Court decided
Why it matters
Terms to know
No glossary terms are available for this guide.
Primary sources
Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.
- 5798f6c1dd635386d3b1-r1-0b857fb8d9df2bfe.pdforal argument transcript
Guide generated September 26, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.