2018 Supreme Court term

PDR NETWORK, LLC, ET AL. v. CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC, INC.

Dockets 17-1705Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What each side argues

Petitioner Position

According to Ms. Kovner (Petitioner), according to Ms. Kovner (Petitioner), the petitioner argues that the agency’s rule defining unsolicited advertisement should be followed by the Court, and if the Court declines to follow it, it must provide a reason.

According to Mr. Phillips, the petitioner contends that the appellate court should not be required to harmonize the FCC rule with the statute, and that liability can be imposed under the FCC rule without such harmonization.

Respondent Position

According to Mr. Hara, the respondent argues that when a district court refuses to accept a final FCC order interpreting the TCPA because it conflicts with the statute, the court is determining the validity of that order.

According to Mr. Hara, the respondent emphasizes that the dispute concerns the underlying merits of the FCC’s interpretation of the TCPA.

What happened at oral argument

Oral argument began at 10:08 a.m. before the Supreme Court.

According to Justice Kagan, justice Kagan raised a separation‑of‑powers problem.

Justice Kavanaugh asked whether the actions were unconstitutional.

According to Justice Breyer, justice Breyer referenced the “Prior, adequate, and exclusive” standard.

According to Justice Gorsuch, justice Gorsuch noted the word “exclusive” and that there are more words after it.

According to Chief Justice Roberts, chief Justice Roberts thanked counsel after the argument.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 8ae3f88c3aa70452c16f-r1-e9566a75d3278d05.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 26, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.