2017 Supreme Court term

O. JOHN BENISEK, ET AL. v. LINDA H. LAMONE, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL.

Dockets 17-333Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What each side argues

Appellants’ Position

According to Mr. Kimberly, the appellants argue that other tests proposed by amici are not appropriate for the Sixth District focus of the case.

According to Mr. Kimberly, an example of the alleged gerrymandering effect is the change in the Eighth Congressional District.

According to Mr. Kimberly, metrics used to predict electoral outcomes are reliable and uncontested.

According to Michael B. Kimberly, the burden under the First Amendment makes it more difficult for particular citizens to achieve electoral success because their views are disapproved by those in power.

Appellee’s Position

According to Mr. Sullivan, there is no showing of a totality of circumstances indicating historical or sociological exclusion of a minority group.

According to Mr. Sullivan, republicans are a major party that has frequently controlled government, not a protected minority.

What happened at oral argument

Justice Sotomayor asked whether any other test applied, referencing the ACLU.

According to Justice Ginsburg, justice Ginsburg inquired about permissible de minimis exceptions.

According to Justice Gorsuch, justice Gorsuch questioned causation and the effect of voter approval on intent.

Justice Kennedy asked whether a Maryland constitutional provision requiring partisan advantage would be lawful.

The hearing adjourned at 11:06 a.m.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

According to Michael B. Kimberly, the burden under the First Amendment makes it more difficult for particular citizens to achieve electoral success because their views are disapproved by those in power.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 5733ececf1bcdd92f5f2-r1-d0dc013999b70159.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 26, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.