This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.
In brief
Overview
Background and question before the Court
What each side argues
Petitioners (RADLAX GATEWAY HOTEL, LLC)
According to MR. NEFF, counsel for the petitioners (Mr. Neff) warned that credit‑bids may not reflect fair market value and that “loan‑to‑own” lenders could bid solely to obtain title.
Respondent (AMALGAMATED BANK)
According to Petitioner, ms. Maynard argued that the plan must satisfy the credit‑bidding requirement or, alternatively, that the parties can negotiate a solution under Section 363(k).
What happened at oral argument
Justice Alito asked how often a buyer other than the stalking horse obtains the property in this procedure.
Justice Scalia asked what the petitioners had tried and failed to prove.
According to Chief Justice Roberts, chief Justice Roberts thanked counsel and noted that the case was submitted.
What the Court decided
Why it matters
Terms to know
No glossary terms are available for this guide.
Primary sources
Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.
- 81e183794172194ddba7-r1-da13218405603df1.pdforal argument transcript
Guide generated September 24, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.