2010 Supreme Court term

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. CONNECTICUT, ET AL.

Dockets 10-174Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

Petitioners were represented by Peter D. Keisler, Esq.

Respondents were represented by Barbara D. Underwood, Esq.

Neal Kumar Katyal, Esq., Acting Solicitor General, Department of Justice, appeared on behalf of the Tennessee Valley Authority in support of Petitioners.

What each side argues

Petitioners

Petitioners argued that the case did not involve prudential standing.

Respondents

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

What happened at oral argument

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 2cff8e7c7263a42a29b2-r1-45b8061732e6f511.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 24, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.