2008 Supreme Court term

DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT, ET AL. v. WILLIAM G. OSBORNE.

Dockets 08-6Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

What each side argues

Kenneth M. Rosenstein (Petitioner)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

State (Petitioner)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

Respondent (William G. Osborne)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

Solicitor General (Petitioner)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

Mr. Neufeld (Respondent)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

MR. NEUFELD (Respondent)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

MR. ROSENSTEIN (Petitioner)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

What happened at oral argument

According to Justice Souter, justice Souter questioned whether the evidence might be exonerating.

Justice Ginsburg asked about the two confessions.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • f5f7508d3c9cc4fb3031-r1-a69bd8d00b97df8a.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 23, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.