2008 Supreme Court term

SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT #1, ET AL. v. APRIL REDDING.

Dockets 08-479Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

The petitioners argued that the search of Savana Redding was constitutional because they had reason to suspect she possessed contraband that posed a health and safety risk.

The United States, as amicus curiae, argued that intrusive body searches in the school context require greater justification under the Fourth Amendment.

Background and question before the Court

The petitioners argued that the search of Savana Redding was constitutional because they had reason to suspect she possessed contraband that posed a health and safety risk.

What each side argues

Petitioner (Safford Unified School District #1)

According to Mr. Wolf, the petitioner contended that without specific suspicion of finding the contraband, a broader search would not be justified.

According to MR. WRIGHT, the petitioner emphasized that the scope of the search must be limited, arguing that searching for items like heroin or bullets would be unacceptable in a school setting.

Respondent (April Redding)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

What happened at oral argument

According to Chief Justice Roberts, chief Justice Roberts opened the argument, noting the case number and parties.

Justice Kennedy asked whether the school setting affects the permissibility and scope of the search.

Justice Alito asked whether the issue was a question of law or a factual question about reasonable suspicion.

Justice Scalia further asked whether probable cause is a question for a jury.

The United States, as amicus curiae, argued that intrusive body searches in the school context require greater justification under the Fourth Amendment.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 67cdea52986cf6b2bbde-r1-99248ed6d0b508eb.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 23, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.