2006 Supreme Court term

KEITH BOWLES v. HARRY RUSSELL, WARDEN

Dockets 06-5306Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

Justice Ginsburg asked what type of jurisdiction was being discussed.

Justice Scalia asked whether the rule could be waived.

Justice Alito asked how one would find out when a case was entered on the docket.

What each side argues

Petitioner (Keith Bowles)

The petitioner argues that equitable tolling and waiver exceptions apply to the deadline, and that a judge’s specific assurance permits reopening the case.

Respondent (Harry Russell, Warden)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

What happened at oral argument

Justice Ginsburg asked what type of jurisdiction was being discussed.

Justice Scalia asked whether the rule could be waived.

Justice Alito asked how one would find out when a case was entered on the docket.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 7f245a1dd319c031fdf8-r1-fa5493e9c2c488a7.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 22, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.