2004 Supreme Court term

CITY OF SHERRILL, NEW YORK v. ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

Dockets 03-855Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

According to Ira S. Sacks, the State of New York, as amicus, argued that the Treaty of Buffalo Creek and earlier treaties extinguished Indian title and other Indian possessory rights to the properties at issue long before the Oneida Indian Nation purchased the properties in 1997 and 1998.

Respondents claim that they can now exercise sovereignty over any plot of land they buy within a vast 300,000‑acre tract in Central New York that has long been inhabited almost entirely.

According to Respondents, the Treaty of 1838 clearly disestablishes the reservation, which terminates all sovereignty prospectively.

Background and question before the Court

According to Justice O'Connor, justice O'Connor questioned whether sovereignty can be lost by a tribe’s inaction over time.

What each side argues

City of Sherrill, New York (Petitioner)

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

Oneida Indian Nation of New York (Respondent)

Respondents claim that they can now exercise sovereignty over any plot of land they buy within a vast 300,000‑acre tract in Central New York that has long been inhabited almost entirely.

According to Respondents, the Treaty of 1838 clearly disestablishes the reservation, which terminates all sovereignty prospectively.

What happened at oral argument

According to Justice O'Connor, justice O'Connor questioned whether sovereignty can be lost by a tribe’s inaction over time.

According to Respondents, the Treaty of 1838 clearly disestablishes the reservation, which terminates all sovereignty prospectively.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 8e09b8aeff3d5caf5356-r1-4342e184b148a550.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 21, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.