2003 Supreme Court term

JAY SHAWN JOHNSON v. CALIFORNIA.

Dockets 03-6539Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Petitioner JAY SHAWN JOHNSON filed a petition against the State of CALIFORNIA (No. 03‑6539).

Background and question before the Court

The matter before the Court involved petitioner JAY SHAWN JOHNSON versus the State of CALIFORNIA.

During oral argument, a Justice asked, “I thought part of that was that…”.

What each side argues

California

According to California, california presented an argument during oral argument.

What happened at oral argument

Oral argument was heard before the Supreme Court at 10:08 a.m.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 678c3f9b1b1b6ec06c22-r1-a05d7ad686574641.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 20, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.