2003 Supreme Court term

JEFFREY A. BEARD, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v. GEORGE E. BANKS.

Dockets 02-1603Argued
AI-generated independent summary

This educational guide is based on the linked primary sources. It is not a Court publication, is not affiliated with the Court, and is not legal advice.

In brief

Overview

Guide pending. Verified case metadata and available source documents are shown below while a supported explanation is prepared.

Background and question before the Court

According to Justice, qUESTION: You mean that Teague is a new rule.

According to Justice, qUESTION: Yes, the direct appeal.

What each side argues

Petitioner: JEFFREY A. BEARD, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

Respondent: GEORGE E. BANKS.

Source-limited. The record does not yet support a complete account.

What happened at oral argument

According to Justice, qUESTION: You mean that Teague is a new rule.

According to Justice, qUESTION: Yes, the direct appeal.

What the Court decided

Pending This section will be added when the relevant Court material is available.

Why it matters

Source-limited The available primary sources do not support a complete explanation yet.

Terms to know

No glossary terms are available for this guide.

Primary sources

Read the source materials on the official site or open the immutable repository copy used for this guide.

  • 3f519cf08d5000c5a953-r1-dcf70b9c68c9d9e4.pdforal argument transcript

Guide generated September 20, 2026. Automated validation accepted this version.